One thing I want to say to Mr. Rick Riordan

Rick Riordan, The Heroes of Olympus, The Mark of AthenaI just finished reading The Mark of Athena, Book Three in the Heroes of Olympus series, and I read something of someone else’s Facebook page and I just had to agree.

Yeah, why did Percy Jackson and Annabeth Chase had to fall down a chasm leading straight to Tartarus, the darkest depths of Greek and Roman hell? Why?

Although, I have to say, at least that gives Daedalus’s laptop a chance at retrieval. It would really be quite a waste to lose something so awesome.

Rick Riordan, The Heroes of Olympus, The House of HadesRick Riordan, The Kane Chronicles, The Red PyramidI don’t have House of Hades just yet. So, I started with the first book of The Kane Chronicles, The Red Pyramid. I like the fact that there is quite a familiar air to everything in the book. I’ll be reading the series while waiting for when I can get my hands on Book Four of the Heroes of Olympus series.

Now, this is what I want to say to Mr. Rick Riordan:

Can you Norse mythology, please? Loki… Thor… The Valkyrie… Ragnarök… Valhalla? That’d be really cool, thanks.

Or you could do Filipino mythology. We’ve got a whole slew of monsters just waiting for heroes armed with ancient magic to come by.

It’d be really interesting to read how he would weave Norse (or Filipino) mythology into everything he has already written.

I should say, whatever epicness Percy Jackson and his friends have brought, is bringing, and will bring, Maximum Ride will still be my most favorite series. I have a special kind of attachment to it.

That is, next to The Chronicles of Narnia. Then again, Narnia is in an altogether different list so Maximum Ride can remain at the top.

Advertisements

Playing God

Almost three years ago I wrote an article, “On human-whatever-species-else hybrids” and in it I posed a question that states, “Can the evince of both species features be manipulated?”. A year later, I wrote another article on a similar topic, “On human-avian hybrids“. In it I managed to cite the “latest” on research on human-animal hybrids.

nucleus of a cow eggThe two articles somehow contradicted each other as one cites the creation of a 32-celled human-bovine embryo while the other one cites a quote that leans to the impossibility of combination. Today, almost two years later, the top search result on Google on this topic is an article from two years ago. The article is not even about a group which aims to create recombinant species but for medicine – their goal is “the development of new therapies for debilitating human conditions such as Parkinson’s disease and stroke”. Clearly, not much progress has been made in this area of science.

Then again, we can’t know about “top-secret” and “highly confidential” information using the surface of the web.

So, now the question goes down from whether it will be possible to control the evince of the species features to whether it will be possible to create a complete recombinant creature. As from before, there can be two sides to ask from.

First, the highly biblical people. Recombinant lifeforms are creatures which are never mentioned in the Bible. Therefore, if we ask some of them, as I have done, they will simply cite verses in the Bible that states something about creatures reproducing according to its kind. Also, they will cite about there only being one Creator and that Creator is not among humans. Therefore, it won’t be possible for recombinant creatures to have existed or to be created.

Second, the highly scientific people. From the 1960’s, when recombinant DNA technology first emerged, various research by numerous teams have been conducted that lead to the improvement of knowledge about DNA and its applications. It used to be that every attempt at recombination was a failure. But further research discovered significant components of the DNA that lead to the possibility of injecting foreign genes to an organism, either to add to its intrinsic value, to its aesthetic value, or, in a very straight-forward thought, to try to learn more about it and improve techniques.

As with combining different species, Leslie Pray of Nature Education in the article Recombinant DNA Technology and Transgenic Animals states,

The first actual recombinant animal cells weren’t developed until about a decade after the research conducted by Berg’s team, and most of the early studies involved mouse cells. In 1981, for example, Franklin Costantini and Elizabeth Lacy of the University of Oxford introduced rabbit DNA fragments containing the adult beta globin gene into murine (mouse) germ-line cells. (The beta globins are a family of polypeptides that serve as the subunits of hemoglobin molecules.) Another group of scientists had demonstrated that foreign genes could be successfully integrated into murine somatic cells, but this was the first demonstration of their integration into germ cells. In other words, Costantini and Lacy were the first to engineer an entire recombinant animal (albeit with relatively low efficiency).

Since these early studies, scientists have used recombinant DNA technologies to create many different types of recombinant animals, both for scientific study and for the profitable manufacturing of human proteins. For instance, mice, goats, and cows have all been engineered to create medically valuable proteins in their milk; moreover, hormones that were once isolated only in small amounts from human cadavers can now be mass-produced by genetically engineered cells. In fact, the entire biotechnology industry is based upon the ability to add new genes to cells, plants, and animals. As scientists discover important new proteins and genes, these technologies will continue to form the foundation of future generations of discoveries and medical advances.

However, as is always the case with new technology, various questions, ranging from the purely scientific to the ethical and moral, arise to challenge such knowledge. And, to quote from the same article above,

Interestingly, not long after the publication of his team’s 1972 study, Paul Berg led a voluntary moratorium in the scientific community against certain types of recombinant DNA research. Clearly, scientists have always been aware that the ability to manipulate the genome and mix and match genes from different organisms, even different species, raises immediate and serious questions about the potential hazards and risks of doing so — implications still being debated today.

Yes, they talk of “mice, goats, and cows” but, apparently, I was wrong and, in the world of science, more specifically, in biotechnology, it may not be long before we could see people and institutions such as the ones described in James Patterson’s Maximum Ride. The question is, are we willing to take the risks that inevitably come with playing the role of the creator?

Change of blog header

Uh-huh, I changed my blog header…

previous header

previous header

new header

new header

I still love Maximum Ride. But this time I wanna make my statement.
Tell me which one is better.
And speakin’ of Max Ride, I haven’t had any updates on the movie and the possibility of a fifth book. I have been checkin’ Fly On but they haven’t talked ‘bout it lately. No updates on the UK website, too. And the James Patterson website newsletter hasn’t told me anythin’ new. But I’ll be checkin’ as often as I can.

Maximum Ride stuff

I just found these links from Fang’s blog, Fly On.

Movie Casting

His choices are kinda good. Except, the age of actor-character played kinda don’t match but the guys are not called actors for nothing.

Monster

A cool Maximum Ride FanFic. Except of it’s being a total cliffhanger but the author is kinda crazy – crazy, I mean, you know what I mean…